Descartes and Hume’s Infinity Essay

The word timeless founding refers to several(prenominal) impressions only if all pertains to approximately topic that is without bound or endless. Most of the time, it is determinationd in the empyrean of mathematics but the sentiment is also used in several other fields including philosophy. This paper bequeath try to study Rene Descartes and David Humes fantasys and views of timelessness as well as the problems regarding their concepts. For Rene Descartes, the word timelessness is attributed and is referred to a perfect world, to god. On the other hand, although most of his infinity raises most paradoxes that be sincerely challenging for his empiricism, David Hume asserts that we can non comprehend infinity.According to Descartes, infinity is the same as graven image or that divinity fudge is the same as infinity. He also proves the existence of God by utilise the concept of infinity as an illustration. Descartes also said that he is able to let on infinity because he is able to think and imagine a large object and as well as a larger object but non the largest object. Descartes stated the existence of god is proven by the use of infinity because according to him, if you have the judgment of infinity and yet cannot witnessed it proves the existence of God.This is because our so called finite self will not be able to turn in the idea of something like infinity and thitherfore the idea must thence came from a somewhere or someone of space being, from God. The ability of God is also proven by infinity because according to Descartes, the continuity of thing should be conserved and in that respectfore needs the continuous power that is living it.On the other hand, according to David Hume, because it is by faith that we know that God exist and so we will know his nature in the heaven. If there is a God with infinite attributes, then he is therefore unendingly incomprehensible without proportion to us human beings. Therefore Hume obj ects the concept of infinity because we cannot experience infinity therefore we have no adequate idea of what infinity really is. Because of his belief and thinking, he even proposes to replace the popular opinion of endless or unbounded, infinity, by a time and space theory.That all idea that we have is copied from a similar impression is the fundamental of Humes line of merchandises. So according to Hume, our idea of God together with his attributes such as his infinite intelligence, good being and all his infinite abilities and characteristics atomic number 18 salutary products of our own mind, increasing that idea without limit those qualities. Therefore our notion and acquaintance of god is not brought by any revelations or something that god be sick on us but rather by of us winning our normal attributes and increasing these attributes to infinity. The major problem regarding the theory and idea of Hume is that it contradicts some principles in geometry such as the Pyt hagorean theorem. David Humes theory includes the disaffirmation of the thesis that extension infinitely divisible. Still, how Hume critiques the idea of infinity is said to be a product of Enlightenment theory of Knowledge. Also the theories of Hume disprove the existence of God in which case most people will unquestionably disagree and critique and would say inverse that we does not create God but rather God created us. In this case it is certain that some(prenominal) people will be against Humes principles and ideology. The problem with Descartes ideas is that he needs the existence of a perfect being in order to be able to have a clear idea of what is infinity. Also the argument of Descartes is a circular argument because he proves the existence of God using the idea of infinity and at the same time his idea of infinity relies on the knowledge of God. The clarity of his ideas is relied on God and God on his ideas.Since Descartes infinity theory relies on the concept of having an infinite and perfect being in our mind, there surely be misconceptions and understanding on the concept since our mind is able to entertain several things that may include fiction or something that is untrue.Greek gods, goddesses as well as super heroes are some of the examples that we entertain in our minds that are far and/or not part of the real world. Also since contrastive person have different views and as well knowledge and understanding, there could be as numerous interpretations of the word infinity as there are people. And how about those that did not believe in the existence of God? Does that mean that they are not capable of understanding what infinity is? Definitely not and therefore Descartes concept of infinity applies to limited people only.The main similarity and difference among Rene Descartes ideas of infinity to that of Hume is that both(prenominal) of them uses the concept of God making their argument. They both use the concept and knowledge of a so-cal led infinite being in their arguments.Also they are in different and in conflict because Descartes proves the existence of God by using the concept of infinity and Hume do the opposite, disproving the existence of God as disproving the concept of infinity. In Descartes statement, infinity exist although we cannot see it. The mere fact that the idea of infinity is in our minds prove that there really is an infinite being, a God that created all things and that sustains it by his infinite attributes. On the other hand, Hume believes that we cannot comprehend and understand infinity and it therefore there exist no such thing.It can be said that both Descartes and Hume have an idea of what infinity is. Their difference is the idea whether infinity is doable or not. For Descartes, infinity or God exist although we cannot see it or even imagine it that basically is infinity. On the other hand, Hume disapprove the concept of infinity saying that since we cannot see or visualize infinity, i nfinity does not exist and should be replaced by something that exist, something real like time and space.Although the 2 ideas are conflicting in can be said that they are truly believable and without further and close study of the matter, we may really be misguided. Still, whether we believe Descartes or Hume depends on us, no one will force us to believe someone. What is important is that we really have the footing of our beliefs.ReferenceBrown, R. G. (2007). God, Dog and Spark. Retrieved December 04, 2007 from http//www.phy.duke.edu/rgb/Poetry/hot_tea/hot_tea/node31.htmlHolding, J. P. (No Date). Humaen Understanding. Retrieved December 04, 2007 fromhttp//www.tektonics.org/gk/hume01.htmlLeahy, J. P. (2000). Infinity and infinity of the Universe. Retrieved December 04, 2007 fromhttp//www.jb.man.ac.uk/jpl/cosmo/infinity.html