Ethical Theories Essay

honorable dilemmas are a part of daily life and the solutions presented to them are unremarkably dependent on the ethics that govern the singular facing them. either person at mavin point in time has been go about with a clean dilemma. This can be depict as the determine which are used to determine the right way to tump overle a situation and the wrong way to go about it. Each companionship and community has its own lesson index and in almost societies, an put to death may be viewed tolerable or right, while the same work in a nonher community would be viewed as intolerable and frowned upon.The moral index of a society usu eithery goes hand in hand with religious beliefs and communities which are religiously inclined to film strict rules on what is suitable behaviour and what is not. Societies which have more secular values usually tolerate extreme or eccentric behavior. The difference in opinions of variant people in what is normally right and wrong has led to the discipline of various ethical theories. Two of these theories are utilitarianism and duty ethics. An example of a situation which brought about different ethical carrel points is the Firestone order wear down recall in 1999 and 2000.The company had discovered that its newly designed firestorm radial tire ATX, ATX II and Wilderness AT tires were defective back in 1996, by and by 8 of the 18 times were singled out after they failed a judge that tested the endurance of tires under high speed. Of the 14. 4 million tires sell approximately 6. 5 million tires had to be recalled due to defects in the inside information which baffling the tread and one stain belt separating from the other steel belt and carcass The details has led to serious and even pitch-black accidents as the cars overturned when the accidents occurred while they were in motion.In an attempt to tape difference between utilitarianism and duty ethics we shall consider an engineer workings for the company at the time and the stand he or she would impinge on if they subscribed to utilitarianism or duty ethics Utilitarianism can be described as an ethical theory that proposes that the exercise that brings good or favorable consequences to the majority is not subject to whether it is right or wrong nub it is not subject to questioning. (Fredrick,2003) This theory was greatly championed by utilitarians such as John Stuart Mill.This theory advocates for actions that produce happiness to the greatest or largest flesh of people. In an ideal situation this may be possible that usually any action can produce happiness to many an(prenominal) or a few people depending on the action. The theory does not usually advocate for the use of ethically correct actions at all times and thus actions which may be viewed as wrong sometimes bring happiness to a large group of people solely the actions still remain morally wrong. An engineer subscribing to the utilitarianism way to life would have supported the company stand and the action it took.The company discovered that some tires were defective and did not recall the rest of the tires that had already been sold. This lead to accidents which caused agony and death and it was not until an investigation into the cause of the accidents that finally forced the Firestone Company to admit liability and recall the tires. The company did not recall the tires because it feared the losses that it would face incase the tires were all defective. The company chose to protect their profits margins at the expense of their clients. (Little, 2003)As an engineer with a utilitarianism view point this action would be the best because recalling would mean great losses and downsizing in terms of job which would mean unemployment for many people working at the company affecting both them and their dependants. The duty ethics proposes that the action interpreted in any situation should be just and honest and respectful to all persons involved. This e thical principle advances for the upholding of principles regardless to the wrong consequences whether they will be good or bad. (Graham,2004)An engineer working for the Firestone Company would have elect to recall all the defective tires and conducted a through investigation to the causes of the defaults without remote pressure or the threat of law suits as inducement. The engineer moral compass would have guided them to make such a stand regardless to the fallout which is this case would have resulted in major losses to the company. As per the requirements of the engineering employment, this mechanical engineer was ascribed to some basic radical ethics and the relevant professional codes of conduct while in the legal power of their duty.These are guidelines aimed at providing safety standards for the engineers while at work and the park good of the society. However, the same was objectively inadequate in the Firestones case. As a basic requirement, they should exercise their p rofessional skills and also knowledge in providing contentment in the general human life. Impartiality and honesty should control in their service where fidelity to the public should never be compromised in a higher place that of clients and also employers. Elsewhere, engineers should pursue a continued development in their profession and bring service to their different clients without any conflict.These are the basic fundamental principle of mechanical engineers whose proficiency is provided by the support of the canons of mechanical engineering. In destination the moral stand point taken by any individual should always be after requiring all the necessary information. This is because in both decision made, there are always individuals who love and those who benefit. As in the Firestone, the recalling decision would have resulted in loss. After careful evaluation one should decide on the decision that brings minimal losses in the involved activity.