Theories of Feminist Geography

Theories of feminist geographicsDoes a womens liberationist geographics take up be primarily concerned with the lives of women?In relation to the essay title, agree to Dias et al (2008), Hesse- Biber (2012) and McDo swell (1992), in that location are signifi bottom of the inningt diversity and heterogeneity among feminist geographics and its query, with no single methodology or epistemology. Therefore, instead of exhibit feminist geography as a static sub-discipline, feminist geography should be examined by looking at a wide escape of utilization produced by feminist geographers addressing the issues found in different contexts, with vary explore aims. By examining existing studies, this essay aims to demonstrate the point that several(prenominal) aspects of feminist geography earn, in fact, been primarily concerned with lives of women in a socio- spatial context. Subsequently, this essay also aims to demonstrate that feminist geography did not engage exclusively with the lives of women by examining practices within the geography discipline, associated with the disciplines exclusion of womanish, feminist geographer imbibe offered master(prenominal) insights for geographers in infrastanding sexual urge bias embedded in geography, and has facilitated the re-evaluation of geographic knowledge and practices among scholars.According to Dixon et al (2014), feminist geography is primarily concerned with improving womens lives by hearing, and to develop an infrastanding of the sources of womens oppression, as well as the dynamics and spatiality of the oppression. This description of feminist geography is mirrored by work produced by feminist geographers that has adapted Marxist supposition in examining the transaction among economic development, space and gender chthonian capitalism (Pratt, 1994). These feminist geographers were think on the fond- spatial exclusion of suburban households feminine members from paid employment, which was an v aluable element in reproduction of compass power, and has provided insights to how traditional gender transaction in capitalisticic societies are continued and preserved (Pratt, 1994 Mackenzie et al, 1983 Hawkesworth 2006 Seccombe 1974 Beechey 1977 Eisenstein 1979 Nelson, 1986 Massey, 1984 Chant et al, 1995 Hanson et al, 1995 Gerstein, 1973). feminist geographers shoot argued that the isolation of women from employment a strategy that is vital to c everywhere the effects of capitalist economy it reproduces the overabundant- subordinate that is essential to the operations of capitalist production (Hawkesworth 2006 Eisenstein 1979 Beechey 1977 Pratt, 1994). The isolation also facilitates daily and gene demythologized reproduction of advertise power, plus it leave behinds to the creation of a labour party force, which consists of women who are willing to be working for slight than substantive wages (Mackenzie et al, 1983 Pratt, 1994 Seccombe 1974 Hawkesworth 2006 Beechey 1977 Nelson 1986 Eisenstein 1979 Massey, 1984 Chant et al, 1995 Hanson et al, 1995 Pearson, 1986). This was demonstrated in Nelsons (1986) and Hawkesworths (2006) study, as he mentioned that in 1970s, capitalist in the United States had relocated to suburban locations in aiming to employ, or further exploit, harmonise to Marxist perspectives, housewives who are more(prenominal) inclined to work despite the less than substantive wages. It has also been revealed that governmental policies, working-class household strategies, as well as traditional male power exercised in both families and change unions are interplaying factors facilitate the isolation of women as housewives to inhibit or understate employment opportunities available to women (Mackenzie et al, 1983 Hawkesworth 2006 Seccombe 1974 Eisenstein 1979 Nelson 1986 Pratt, 1994 Massey, 1984 Hanson et al, 1995 Gerstein, 1973). These literatures by feminist geographers are fundamentally tie in to the lives of women (Johnson, 200 7 Pratt, 1994 Hanson et al, 1995 Seccombe, 1974). By using womens lives as point of departure, they take a crap identify the consequences of the exclusion of women from employment creation of female labour that are more prone to be subjected to capitalistic exploitation, enabled by traditional gender and social relations which constitute capitalism, in conjunction with patriarchal gender relations, which cede contributed to the redefining of the spatial distribution of womens social and economic activities in urban areas.However, feminist geographers did not engage exclusively with the lives of women. feminist geographers are also concerned with development of geography, in relation to the exclusion and isolation of female scholars from the discipline, and how this has affected geographic research and thought. As Morin (1995 1) has described, the theme of these studies is gender of geography rather that the geography of gender . Under this theme, feminist geographers have highlig hted the fact that geography is a male- dominated discipline (Rose, 1993 Dixon et al, 2006 LeVasseur, 1993). As suggested by Dixon et al (2006), women have been excluded from higher education from late nineteenth to early twentieth century early universities mainly consists of upper- class blanched men. During that period of time, female are mainly found in the field of teaching and destiny professions, and are mostly absent in the disciplines and institutions that have contributed to the establishment of youthful geography, much(prenominal) as geology and expert societies, such as Royal geographic Society (Rose, 1993 Dixon et al, 2006). These expert societies were heavily involved with the establishment of geography as a discrete academic discipline, by defining geographys investigating agenda and methodologies, as well as establishing programs in university (Dixon et al, 2006). Since these societies had doorway requirements based on peer nomination and work assessment, it w as difficult for women to adjunction such societies, as their works are often dismissed as non- scholarly (Dixon et al, 2006). As a result, these institutions had a disproportionately large numbers racket of male members (Rose, 1993 Dixon et al, 2006). As female are not able to carry off in this field of study due to institutional discrimination , white men were able to almost exclusively define what constitute as the norm in the discipline, which has allowed masculinist thinking to thrive and flourish in geography (Rose, 1993 Dixon et al, 2006).A number of scholars have pointed out as men have associated themselves with attributes or descriptions in their studies on landscape, such as culture, intellectualism, practicality and mobility (Rose, 1993 Pile, 1994 Berg, 1994). The adaptation of dualistic worldview that was assumed to be objective and scientifically sound has meant that women are thence associated with nature, proboscis and emotionalism (Rose, 1993 Berg, 1994 Lloyd, 1 984). Further, masculinist thinking believes that men are capable of rational thought, whereas women are not, as female-ness was thought of as the inadequacy of maleness (Jay, 1981 Massey, 1998 Longhurst, 2000 Lloyd, 1984 Bordo, 1986 Berg, 1994). Together, these beliefs have helped to establish a hierarchical, binary emulation between mind and body culture and nature men and women, with the latter assumed to be lacking(p) and less important (Pile, 1994 Rose, 1993 Berg, 1994 Lloyd, 1984). Dualistic world views have also meant that, harmonise to masculinist thinking, men are traditionally associated with public spaces, due to their association with waged work, which requires mobility and discussion (Dixon et al, 2006 Rose, 1993 Longhurst, 2000 Berg, 1994). Therefore in contrast, women are typically associated with private spaces due to their traditionally assigned role as care- taker at home (Dixon et al, 2006 Rose, 1993 Longhurst, 2000 Bordo, 1986). Men self- proclaimed attribu tes, facilitated by dualistic world views have facilitated the formation of a pecking order in geography in relation to gender (Rose, 1993). The hierarchical opposition signifies that spaces that are typically associated with female, reproduction activities are deemed as less important and less valued when comparing to spaces that are associated with men and their waged production activities (Dixon et al, 2006). Dixon et al (2006) has demonstrated that geographer has thus focus their studies on male productive activities, such as steel manufacturing, rather than investigating reproductive activities that are traditionally associated with women, such as day care for example. As stated by Dixon et al (2006), this bias is reproduced in the discipline across multiple research area. This argument demonstrates the conundrums underlying geography the focus on production congeneric to reproduction within geography signifies the existence of a knowledge happy chance within the discipline , in regard to areas associated with female economic and social activities. Furthermore, this can discourage scholars, who aim to examine or carry out research in fields associated with female activities, to engage with geography due to concerns over the research prioritization mentioned above, and turn to other disciplines that they feel their research will be valued (Dixon et al, 2006). Together, these diminish the scope of geographic investigation, further reducing any potential knowledge that would have been produced and incorporated within the discipline of geography, which lead to the diminishing of the academic significance of geography, and this urges the re-thinking of geographic practices, in order to decrease bias due to the disciplines masculinist legacy (Dixon et al, 2006 Pile, 1994 Monk et al, 1982).In conclusion, the works of feminist geographers examined in this essay have all dual-lane a common theme- the exclusion of women and the consequences, in different cont exts or settings. In some aspects of feminist geography, feminist geographers have directly engaged with the lives of women studies have attempt to undercover ways in which women are oppressed under capitalism, and to demonstrate how womens lives, in regards to their economic opportunities, are limited as a result of the exclusion from employment. However, this essay has also demonstrated that there are existing studies in which the primary concern is the development of discipline, under the influence of limited female participation. They have highlighted that the disciplines lack of female involvement, which has facilitated the flourishing of traditional masculine thinking as dominant discourse in geography, has in turn lead to the production of one-sided knowledge and skewed research approaches that constitute geography- this remained to be an internal, innate problem that results in the narrowing of the scope of study, and has imposed limits on the production of geographic knowl edge. The problems highlight above, by feminist geographers, can perhaps urge geographers to second thought their research priorities and focuses, to avoid the induction, or reproduction of masculine- orientated bias in geography, to overcome the legacy of male- domination in order to facilitate wider, more depth understanding of space/ place and social relations and activities. Together, these studies have confirmed that there is significant diversity among feminist geography feminist geographers have addressed a range of issue or concerns that advert to gender bias or inequality in different contexts. frankincense it can be said that the primary concern cannot therefore be generalized into one subject of concern.ReferenceKaren Dias Jennifer Blecha (2007) Feminism and Social surmise in Geography An Introduction , The Professional Geographer, 59(1) 1-9LeVasseur, M (1993) Finding a Way Encouraging Underrepresented Groups in Geography An Annotated Bibliography. Indiana, PA National Council for geographical EducationRose, G. (1993) Feminism and geography the limits of geographical knowledge. Cambridge Polity mess.Massey, D. (1998) Blurring the binaries? High technical school in Cambridge. In Ainley, R. (ed.) New frontiers of space, bodies and gender, capital of the United Kingdom RoutledgeMorin, K (1995) The Gender of Geography. postmodern Culture. Online 32 Available at http//pmc.iath.virginia.edu/text-only/issue.195/review-3.195Accessed 19 February 2015MacKenzie, S Rose, D (1983) Industrial change, the domestic economy and home life. In Anderson J Ducan, S Hudson, R (eds.) Redundant Spaces in Cities and Regions? Social Geography and Industrial Change. capital of the United Kingdom Achedemic PressDixon, D.P. Jones III, J.P. (2006) feminist Geographies of Difference, Relation, and Construction. In Aitken, S Valentine, G (eds.) Approaches to Human Geography. world(prenominal) SAGELinda McDowell (1992) Doing Gender Feminism, libbers and Research Methods in Human Geography. Transactions of the found of British Geographers New Series, 17(4) 399-416Beechey, V. (1977) Some notes on female wage labour in capitalist production. Capital and Class, 3, Autumn 45-66Eisenstein, Z. (1979) Developing a theory of capitalist patriarchy and socialist feminism. In, Eisenstein, Z. (ed.) Capitalist Patriarchy and the Case for state-controlled Feminism. New York Monthly ReviewNelson, K. (1986) Female labour supply characteristics and the suburbanization of low-wage shoes work. In Scott, A Storper, M (eds) Production, work, territory the geographical anatomy of industrial capitalism. Boston and London Allen and UnwinPearson, R. (1986) Latin American women and the new international fraction of labour a reassessment. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 5(2) 67-79Chant, S. McIlwaine, C. (1995) Gender and trade manufacturing in the Philippines continuity and change in female employment? The campaign of the Mactan Export Processing Zone. Gender Place and Culture 2(2) 147-76Nelson, K. (1986) Female labour supply characteristics and the suburbanization of low-wage office work. In Scott, A Storper, M (eds) Production, work, territory the geographical anatomy of industrial capitalism. Boston and London Allen and UnwinMassey, D. (1984) Spatial divisions of labour. London MacmillanHawkesworth, M.E. (2006) Feminist Inquiry From Political Conviction to Methodological Innovation. New Brunswick, NJ Rutgers Unversity PressMcDowell, L (1992) Doing Gender Feminism, Feminists and Research Methods in Human Geography. Transactions of the comprise of British Geographers New Series, 17 (4) 399-416Seccombe, W (1974) The Housewife and Her Labour under Capitalism. New Left Review, 83 3-24Pratt, G (1994) Feminist geographies. In Johnston, R Gregory, D Smith D (eds) The Dictionary of Human Geography (3rd edn) Oxford BlackwellHanson, S Pratt, G (1995) Gender, Work, and Space. New York RoutledgePile, S (1994) Masculinism, the use of dualistic epistemol ogies and third spaces. Antipod 26(3) 255-277Johnson, L. C. (1994) What proximo for feminist geography? Gender, Place Culture A journal of Feminist Geography, 1(1) 103-113Gerstein, Ira 1973 Domestic Work and Capitalism, Radical America , 7 (45)101-128.Longhurst, R (2000) Geography and gender masculinities, male identity and men. Progress in Huma Geography 25(3) 439-444Berg, L. D. (1994) Masculinity, place and a binary discourse of theory and empirical investigation in the human geography of Aotearoa/New Zealand, Gender, Place Culture. A Journal of Feminist Geography 1(2) 245-260Bordo, S.(1986) The Cartesian masculinization of thought. Signs 11 (3) 439456Jay, N. (1981) Gender and dichotomy. Feminist Studies 7(1) 38-56Lloyd, G. (1984) The Man of Reason male and female in Western philosophy. London MethuenJanice, M Hanson, S (1982) On not excluding half of the human in human geography. The Professional Geographer 34(1) 11-23Hesse-Biber, S.N. (2012) Feminist Research Exploring, Inte rrogating, and Transforming the Interconnections of Epistemology, Methodology, and Method. In Hesse- Biber, S.N. (ed.) Handbook of Feminist Research Theory and Praxis (2nd edn) International SAGE